John Shaft is the perfect example of what Engaging Cinema calls the Buck. He is a ruthless character who is portrayed as very masculine and powerful. He somewhat breaks the typical barriers because he has both black and white allies. It is as if race does not matter to Shaft but it is a bigger deal that he himself is a strong and influential black man. I saw somewhat of a duality when it comes to Shaft's character. He is the main hero in the film which changes what the typical "hero" was at the time this film was made. While this is happening changing the views, other things about the film are perpetuating some of the stereotypes that already exist. A lot of the men Shaft encounters are black men which stills puts them in the role of the "bad guys". Also, Shaft is a womanizer which puts him in a bad light and aims at the stereotype that black men do not treat their wives right. I was a little confused as to why this movie tried to break barriers when it comes to black stereotypes but at the same time was going along with other ones.
One thing which Glenn Erickson brings up in his review that is interesting is that the writer of this film was actually a white man. Ernest Tidyman wrote the screenplay for this movie and in 1971 this would not have been publicized. During the time the movie came out, people might not have gone to the movie if they found it was written by a white man. The fact that the movie focused on the life of a black man was the draw for a lot of people and so they did not really play up the fact that it was written by Ernest. Something interesting also is that Ernest Tidyman won a NAACP Image Award for this movie and was one of the few white men to do so.
I think it is definitely important to note, as you did, that Shaft attempts to dispel popular stereotypes of blacks, yet reinforces many, not only for blacks, but for other groups as well. It is certainly true that Shaft is a perfect fit for the "buck" Stereotype. I had heard about the fact that the writer was white, but I find it extremely interesting that the anti-blaxploitation NAACP awarded him for his portrayal of blacks despite its many stereotypes.
ReplyDeleteI like the way you described Shaft as more concerned with what he represented than with race itself and the race of those that surround him. I think it is very much so a tell it like it is film, which is why it was such a big deal. I also think that might be why the film both enhanced and tried to break steroetypes, along with the fact that the movie industry needed to make money, and characters with those traits sold movies, which was their exact goal.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with the review when it says that the movie only plays to one type of audience. I think many people would like to relate the character of Shaft. I think that it is idealistic for both black and white people alike. Even as a women watching the film, I would like to have the authority that Shaft has with the people around him.
ReplyDelete